"I will still relunctantly vote for BUSH for the good of the security of the country (don't trust the ability of Kerry to
run a war on Terror, and this is a dangerous time for the future of America, here and abroad."

this is a perfect example of what i don't get. how do you compare a guy who has actually led people successfully in combat, held real jobs (prosecuter), served in the legislature for decades and can answer an impromptu question without sounding like a moron to a guy who's a chckenhawk, ducked service, never run a successful business, dodged testimony at the 9/11 hearings until they agreed uncle dick could come along and hold his hand and has arguably done a completely INCOMPETANT job of running the "war on terror" already and come up with the answer that you still have to vote for GWB!