>>So, you never said...

There is not a shred of evidence to prove that any such person existed. The only literature from that time period to state it is so is the bible and other Church literature and let's just say that literature is likely to be somewhat biased. We need independent and impartial evidence and there is not a shred. None. Zilch.

I give up as well. Your anti-religious fundementalism is worse that the TV evangelists we hear preaching for it!<<

That was in reference to a wise, compassionate teacher that gained a following that founded a church in his honor after his death. Never happened.

That a group of royals repackaged Julius Caesar, put the most unethical garbage anyone ever read into his mouth and said, "Here's you god, worship him or else" and people did without question? Now, that I believe quite easily.

>>And why should I admit anything like you request about the figure of Jesus? One minute he doesn't exist at all, Next he is a self-righteous, nasty, little scumbag who said nothing of value.<<

Once again, a wise, compassionate teacher that served as Jesus never existed. Not do I personally believe in a cult leader that gained a following. I believe Roman royals repackaged Julius Caesar and made him a total prick so that the masses would not get out of line. You can believe what you want.

>>What I am willing to accept is that no-one realy knows anything about him apart from the worlds major religion was built in his name.<<

Julius= "son of god" I think we know a lot more about him that we are willing to admit.

>>Why would you want to defame a person who you know nothing about, has been dead for 2000 years and can do nothing to defend himself?<<

Awww, poor son of god! I feel so bad.

>>Sounds like insecurity to me. Perhaps you need to get yourself a religion:-)<<

Looks you already did. And look what it's done to your mind. Thanks, but I'll pass.