Quote:
Home Office Minister Vernon Coaker said the proposals had the support of various organisations, including women's and children's groups and police forces. In addition, a petition signed by around 50,000 people objecting to extreme internet sites promoting violence against women in the name of sexual gratification was presented to Parliament.

"The vast majority of people find these forms of violent and extreme pornography deeply abhorrent," he said.

   I guess that all of these people represent a majority. Now of course they must have all viewed this material in order to pass unbiased judgement so from that one could deduct a bit of hypocracy here. If the objecting masses would stop watching this perhaps a law would not be needed to prevent them from doing so. After censorship guidlines are passed into law what brave persons will view this stuff to police the act? Will they be rewarded for allowing the corruption of their souls in order to save ours? Perhaps it should be done by the miliary as they could then be properly honoured by the state. If this could be declared a "War On Porn" similar to the "War On Terror" the Victoria Cross would not be out of reach.