The reason I don't buy what you're saying is that the dems haven't even attempted an impeachment proceeding. Pelosi announced as soon as she became speaker that it was off the table.

It means that the dems have no intention of impeaching regardless of whether the votes are there or not.

It is criminal in and of itself not to at least try with all your strength to impeach this man and his henchmen.

All this garbage that we have more important things to do is just that--garbage. Those problems they refer to will always be there waiting for us, it's not like they'll go away before we can deal with them (if only they would).

It's just a lame excuse NOT to seek impeachment and I find it unheard of. I think 30 years ago impeachment would have been automatic. The problem is, the dems don't want Bush impeached because they hide behind him as much as the pubs. They are too afraid and timid to stand before the public in the open. They are so afraid of failing that they'd rather have dull, stupid Dubya to pin it on.

There's a reason the dems are only slightly more popular than the pubs right now when they should have landslide support. The public simply doesn't trust them even though they don't care for the pubs. I feel exactly the same way.