sj | ||
|
User Name | Thread Name | Subject | Posted |
GUEST,Tug the Cox | BS: Michael Jackson INNOCENT?!!! (49) | RE: BS: Michael Jackson INNOCENT?!!! | 01 Jul 09 |
Posted earlier, somehow got lost, but kendall seems to have replied. I pointed out that he had been convicted of nothing, and that in lae the word for that is innocent. Kendall disagrees, he is mistaken. The presumption in law is innocent. There is no such legal category as not guilty beyond a resonable doubt.I Scotland, but nowhere else, there is a category of 'not proven', but this does not apply to any cases MJ was involved in. |