If you read the document, you'll see that (d) above is not a condition but forms part of the proprietor's original application. In fact, the licensing authority - after their hearing - removed the requirement for "no karaoke". From what I can see, the original proposal from the pub was accepted unaltered except that the licensing authority freed it up a bit.

We really need to avoid trying to suggest that the licensing authorities are requiring things when they're not. It makes our case less than believable if we're accusing them of doing things they aren't.