If by hijack you mean call you out for sticking up for a racist and inaccurate generalization about palestinians, then I don't think anyone is likely to have a problem.

Perhaps making unsupported assertions about the character of palestinians, or defending them is the hijack and the expert testimony pointing out the lie in those assertions is another passenger telling the hijacker to sit down and shut up.

And yes Keith, unlike Jack Straw, Normal Finkelstein is an "expert" and his testimony qualifies as "expert testimony".


But how typical anyway of Keith to use any tactic he can to silence his political opponents when they provide information which shows he is wrong.