"alternative to science" no need-just honest,unbiased enquiry

OK, I'm going to take offence at this, and here's why.

I am a researcher specialising in palaeontology and this idea that the wok I do is anything else than honest or unbiased is slanderous. My objective is the truth, and I happen to know my fellow workers in this field are exactly the same.

I have zero financial or any other vested interest in my research; I do it because I want to know how and why things are why they are, and palaeontology is one way to do this.

To suggest that anyone is dishonest or a liar because they do the work, do the learning, reading and donkey work is not only rude, it's bloody ignorant. I don't take someone else's word for anything, I find out for myself and I trust my co workers to tell me the truth.

In fact, I would think the people that write the shite on creation.com can't hold a candle to those who do honest, unbiased research.