full marks , rob, for a clever back at yer !
however, I am not about to trawl over hundreds of posts just to see if there were any unanswered.......i'll accept that there probably are. bearing in mind that I am the only biblical creationist here tackling a lot of skeptics , I am bound to miss something, and was admittedly unequal to some challenges.   but I don't see that as prohibiting a pov based on what is not tech science but basic reasoning.
as to mungo man,- it is a long song as far as words are concerned. I wrote it from an article called the dating game by tas walker. it detailed the various conflicting dates from different methods and the disagreement between the lake mungo discoverers. my conclusion based on that history being that the "dating game" is "so uncertain, not as sure as some suggest"
it does not say that, therefore the bible timeline is reliable....though of course, I believe it is.

shimrod,- quick clarification-
beetles probably on the ark but not included in the nostril breathing life as qualified in the text.
speciation, yes
all the details....I don't know.
evidence for microbe to man evolution....no.