well thankyou jack, I believe you are not sympathetic to creation, so very fair of you.
joe, my reply re Jonah on other thread.
" I posted a brilliant response........." and I thought you was such a humble fella ! -grin-
would you care to give an example verifying your charge, shimrod ? ! "exactly what creationists do..." yes, freely admitting our bias, unlike evolutionists who don't recognize, or refuse to admit, their own bias. and certainly creation scientists are swimming upstream against the flow of origins belief in academia.
I tend to skim muskets posts, just in case there is anything of any substance that is,nt clothed in mockery or vulgarity.
bill, I will look at new link, but your previous short response still needs, imo , a counter response,-
"....interpretations of carefully selected data..." those to which I refer, relate to data that accords to observational science.
if you care to look again on creation sites ,you will find articles on many aspects, covering much data, including existing problems for creationism.
"...when all other data shows otherwise"    unless you can demonstrate, bill, that remains just an assertion. I reckon the other scientists must have said the same to galilieo.