well bill, you know how to lift former posts and repost them. I guess it should not be too difficult for you to repost all these evidences. that way you don't have to write all the details again.
" overwhelming evidence is ummm overwhelming evidence"....is not evidence !.
again you say that a reasonable scientific explanation was found....but don't say what that is, unless it is your "knowing" all the evidence is that they are that old, and therefore soft tissue can last that long. still sounds like circular reasoning to me.
"..were in no doubt...".....and how many binned scientific -facts- have had that said about them in time past?.
dinos in the bible?...the term was not coined then, but leviathan sounds like it might be a dino. job 41. there are accounts of dinos/dragons in history and artifacts picturing them, though of course such might well be otherwise interpreted, esp by evolutionists.
"....not found in all of them" quite frankly, I think it was a surprise that it was found in any of them, but some has survived as they are only thousands of yr old. that any at all would have persisted, even in the most favourable conditions..eg very low temp...beggers belief, except for those committed to deep time.
we are away for weekend.......that's for the benefit of those who think I,m evading all this [alleged] evidence for evolutionism!.