true bill, you would need an awful long time to observe microbe to mudcatter evolution, but the best we got, is a few human generations that can observe multiple generations of fast reproducing organisms.
as the desired effect has not been achieved, I presume evolutionists need more human generations, or ultra fast reproducers.
as a highly skilled scientist, sciencegeek, I assume you can tell me if the dating techniques know the starting conditions/amounts, whether they can be certain of the rate over the unobserved ages, whether you can be sure that nothing added or subtracted/escaped over those ages in a test sample.
in the mean time, I take the view that , if rocks of known age have been wildly incorrect, why should I trust any other reading.
yes, I should like to see you all "saved" ,but remember, it is not me starting these threads , and I am not planning on letting you have an agreefest!.