stu, I am not sure if I don't explain enough what I mean, but I am rather inclined to think that you know what I mean, even if you can get some other meaning out of my posts.
it is my understanding that it was universally accepted that there were limits to how perishable things like soft tissues and DNA [IF THE WIDER SCIENCE COMMUNITY HAS ACCEPTED ITS PRESENCE IN ANCIENT BONE YET]could last. I would be very surprised if this was just assumed, rather than based on observation . it is also my understanding, that there was never any doubt that such perishables would not be detectable in anything myo. in fact , it is reported that when the scientist discovered it, she expressed disbelief because that was indeed her understanding. but the deep time paradigm trumped formerly accepted experimental science, because we "know" they are myo !.

well shimrod, such imagery is contained in some creationist articles.
seems to me, that cracks in your edifice are not hard to find, which is hardly surprising when it has such poor foundations.
at the very base is whether nothing can produce anything, or there is a creator. I say that is self evident, and you say there is no evidence. what have you left but something out of nothing via no one.
"in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth"
so what are some of these more plausible explanations then ? !.
oh, and can either of you tell me what invention could not be, without recourse to darwinistic ideas ?.
at least, I suppose, you are trying to erect an edifice, instead of still digging yourself into a hole !