I am surprised you're English, you're right. Very few Europeans are ignorant enough to deny science. At least I think you meant me (Marry for Mrrzy is an interesting typo, projective test anyone?).

The *evidence* for evolution is certainly irrefutable. But it's a pendantic quibble of mine to prefer to phrase it that way. I am a scientist, we quibble pedantically a lot. Also pedagogically, as seems to be required here.

Later (microscopic) of the Burgess Shale does indicate a whole lot of evolution before the Cambrian explosion, which was of forms you could see with the naked eye. Now that we can clothe our eyes with lenses there is a lot of pre-Cambrian change in form leading up to the once-called Explosion.