Well, my absence was due to working on some very serious music projects, and due to the fact, that honest and intelligent dialogues on here were getting too rare. You've got facts versus ideological fiction, and the fictional crowd only just keeps repeating bogus talking points, or make equally as stupid assertions, based on emotionally entreating those same bogus, and stupid talking points...

...and I probably won't be engaging in the refutations of the same nonsensical, blathering, as being promoted by those same mentally blocked wannabes.

That being said, Don posted another one of his off-the-wall 'studies' yet claiming that some quasi-researcher, who wanting to promote her new book, found a new place to 'start looking' for the 'missing gene'...because it 'MAY SUGGEST' the 'POSSIBILITY' that it's yet 'another gene'.....because the last time they tried that horse-crap, it got found out to be terrifically in error!....or like the one before the last one posted by 'Dave the Gnome', it contained the finding, that 'OTHER FACTORS PLAY A GREATER ROLE' (of which I agree), in the 'determination' of 'sexual orientation'......but our local 'promoters of hogwash' seemed to disregard...only cherry picking phrases out of context, that appear to support their illiterate opinions!

Fair enough?

GfS