You're beyond debating with, it offers you recognition and pumps your grossly over-inflated ego. You've been given page after page after page of details by people far more patient than me and still persist in your ignorance. Even in this answer, in talking about "the historians" you failed to recognise my more moderate reply to you that there are a raange of viewpoints in the academic community. You might have had a case if you had said "some historians" but you failed to take what I said earlier about your totalitarian viewpoint to heart and still come back trying to tell us you're a leading expert on something you obviuously know nothing about, dragging more worthy names into the mud as you do so. You yourself accepted you're not a historian, and so as I said eariler, but us no buts, your's not a historian SO do us the grace of shutting up and stop annoying the hell out of everyone.