In the meantime, Keith calls anybody who has actually read anything about WW1 as psychopathic liars. He then puts words in your name you never said in order to make you look a cunt.

Are you sure it is others who are "trolling" Gervase? You see, if you read up, Keith is pushing an agenda where he selectively quotes and misquotes, calls any historian not impressed with revision a "lefty" and even started waffling on about Adam Smith being a knight in shining armour to Marx's devil.

If you want to defend UKIP be my guest, but like most of his comrades, he ends up a laughing stock.

No. Read up why situations occur before looking at them. Keith started this thread to heap scorn on people who have reached their own conclusions on history. That he needs conclusions written for him is his problem.

If, as you say, you have been following Mudcat so long, you also know he has form. Going back a long way, refusing to accept society's dim view of war and the disgusting way military leadership and inept MOD waste public money and go looking for the sympathy card whenever they come under scrutiny.