Here we go again. Both Keith and Akenaton crawl out of the woodwork In order to misrepresent a survey carried out by a right-wing newspaper. Akenaton rattles on yet again with his "reasoned discussion" mantra whilst lying about the survey. Keith claims that the survey concluded that 27% believed there was some justification for the Charlie Hebdo killings. The only thing to do here is to do what I did ad nauseam with Keith and his Guardian lie: go back to the source. So here it is: the part of the survey in question asked Muslims if they HAD SOME SYMPATHY FOR THE MOTIVES behind the Charlie Hebdo attacks. The word terrorist was not used in the questions in the survey, nor was there any reference to sympathy for killings (you can read, can you, Keith?). 27% of respondents expressed "some sympathy". Extrapolation beyond that cannot be justified. They did NOT say that they had sufficient sympathy to approve of the killings, and I'm damn sure that the vast majority of that 27% would not have said that if asked (but I won't extrapolate - that's just my opinion). Keith has slurred the Muslim communities of this country by telling that lie. Akenaton has slurred the Muslim communities of this country by saying "All this of course does not excuse the terrorist atrocities being perpetrated by JJ and his fellow demons, no matter how much support they may have from mainstream Muslims." If our resident Islamophobes want to prove that loads of British Muslims are up for killing people because of cartoons, let them conduct their own surveys asking their own questions. But, the benighted pair of you, stop lying, and kindly spare the peace-loving Muslims of this country, the overwhelming majority, your vile insults.