my point is not made invalid, mozart aged 5 did not compose for the sole purpose of money what post of 3 .17?if you are re efrring to my post of 5.29, then if there are any inaccuraccies that is the fault of wiki,none of which invalidates my points
nothing that you have posted invalidates my main points. which is this Bach did not compose his great music solely for commercial purposes neither did mozart. they achieved renown through talent.
compare this to modern bands such as monkees, westlife, spice girls, these are manufactured groups put together solely for commercial purposes, their music is written to a formula, it is bland and samey and compares UNFAVOURABLY to the innovative music of Bach.and to the composotions of Mozart, modern boy and girl bands such as the ones i have mentioned are not put together because they are musically talented, the monkees were as far as i know the first band put together on this basis, compare their musical.compositions and music to the Beatles, THE BEATLES WERE A GROUP WHO WERE NOT MANUFACTURED PURELY FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES.The music of the Beatles is variable but some is good, what is the difference.. they had a bit of talent and could play a bit.
The principle that a band can be manufactured, produced and regardless of talent hyped and using songwriters whose only motive is making money will always produce commercial music lacking in innovation which will be bland and samey.
Steve Shaw, your attempts to score minor points about dates[ a late night tired posting] does not alter the fact that mozart composed his first composotion aged five and did not do it solely for commercial purposes.
Steve, in a debate sometimes it is advisable not to spend your time attempting to score points, and wasting time about acknowledgment of cut and paste, it merely shows that you are concerned with form not content.