I note that the person who was the subject of my comments in my post of 13 Jan 16 - 04:25 PM has returned to this thread with posts on 13 Jan 16 - 08:04 PM and 14 Jan 16 - 03:33 AM. Both of posts are of the combative nature that we have come to expect from him rather than the discursive nature that would help to further the development of the thread. In neither of these subsequent posts does he address the points that I made about the unkind and unworthy comments that he made about one of London's deservedly most popular folk clubs. I would have thought that he should return with at least an explanation, at best an apology, but no, he chooses to ignore my comments and carry on in his usual antagonistic and bellicose manner.
Which figure in public life does this remind me of? I am thinking of our present prime minister who when challenged about some misdeed in parliament on in interview always avoids a direct answer and raises his voice whilst changing the subject to one that reinforces his entrenched positions.