There may be those who may say I'm clouding the issue with "emotional mush," but I think the emotional aspect of this is very important. A child needs to be born into a loving family, a family that wants a child. If the biological parents are unable or unwilling to provide such a home, is it a service to the child to "rescue" him/her from abortion?

I don't think things are right if Those Who Pass Judgment argue against abortion because they think that the biological parents must bear the consequences of their sexual activity. If a child is viewed as the burden/consequences of misconduct, what kind of home is that child going to have?

-Joe-