See the following examples of hate speech against conservatives/religious people from Mudcat members/frequenters in just a span of 5 days from 4 threads. If you think any of them aren't hate speech, try replacing the word "conservative/right-winger/Christian/shaman/etc" with any race or targeted group and see how great they look.


Subject: RE: BS: Beats yellow stars, I suppose!!
From: Stu - PM
Date: 25 Jan 16 - 12:56 PM

Appalling. Under the tories the nation is becoming a nastier, meaner and more depressing place to live.
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Beats yellow stars, I suppose!!
From: Jim Carroll - PM
Date: 27 Jan 16 - 04:16 AM

"Tenants rights are confined to the inside of property in regard to decoration."
The first right of anybody is to defend themselves and their families from harm - tenants or not
These doors were equivalent to hanging signs up and saying "To any right wing thus who happens to be in the vicinity - I am an asylum seeker - please feel free to vandalise my home".
These are the figures of the homes with red doors again
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Beats yellow stars, I suppose!!
From: Jim Carroll - PM
Date: 28 Jan 16 - 05:22 AM
[....]
You have placed yourself more to the right than the most right wing of the British national press and you maintain that position
Your behaviour here is unbelievable
Stomach-heaving, to say the least
Jim Carroll

[edit: May I add this remark was for merely proposing the idea that racism isn't always the cause of certain things? Not to mention's Jim's offensive and hateful suppositions and conjectures too numerous to include on here, including rude name calling saying he wasn't even human merely for disagreeing with him]
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Beats yellow stars, I suppose!!
From: Steve Shaw - PM
Date: 28 Jan 16 - 08:03 PM

Up to this point in the thread, "Steve" has contributed a one-word post expressing support for Jim. I seriously don't need a twit like you, who seldom contributes a anything sensible to any thread on any subject at all, calling me a usual suspect for posting a single one-word post. Anyway, I'll tell you what I think. I think we are being softened up to hate immigrants by a nasty, racist Tory government which never criticises Israeli atrocities, which cosies up to the despicable Saudi regime and which allows fat cats to get away without paying tax. [...]
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Beats yellow stars, I suppose!!
From: Jim Carroll - PM
Date: 29 Jan 16 - 08:11 AM

"They are entitled to free food and accommodation while other people are not."
Why not come out with it Keith and suggest they are electronically tagged - then you wouldn't have to beat about the bush.
The armbands have nothing to do with benefits - they are to identify the wearers as asylum seekers whenever they appear in public - nothing else has been suggested by anyone other than you (one-man campaign again) [edit: they actually are given food, and shelter believe it or not, and some still don't appreciate it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ycq4jrssRI]
They have been judged to be discriminatory and have been withdrawn - you continue to defend them - nothing new there either.
Tell me again that you are not a right-wing extremist - please
Jim Carroll [edit: right wing 'extremist'???? Merely for saying the facts! the fact's you're denying? Who looks like the extremist to you? the one saying facts or the one denying reality?]
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Beats yellow stars, I suppose!!
From: Jim Carroll - PM
Date: 29 Jan 16 - 12:35 PM

"Don't try to introduce them to common sense Keith....I've been trying for a week but I fear they are incompatible :0("
And then there were two - right wing nutters
Jim Carroll
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Beats yellow stars, I suppose!!
From: Jim Carroll - PM
Date: 30 Jan 16 - 05:45 AM

"The contractor "defended the used of the wristbands but said it was looking at alternative ways of managing "the fair provision of support" ""
Wouldn't they just
The rest of Britain seems to have condemned it, asylum seekers have been harassed because of it, it has been compared widely with forcing Jews to wear yellow stars and it has been abandoned as being both degrading and dangerous - and all you people can come up with is "the contractors say it's ok"
It is a way of tagging people and it has been proven to have put people at risk yet our star super-rights continue to defend the use of compulsory markers to identify foreigners - why am I not surprised.
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: BS: Zika vs anti-abortion cults
From: Jack Campin - PM
Date: 28 Jan 16 - 10:17 AM

[....]
there is an impending clash between women and the state in places like Nicaragua where an anti-abortionist cult controls the government. Tens of thousands of women will know they're doomed to spend their lives cleaning up after children with half a brain if they do what their local shaman says.
....
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Zika vs anti-abortion cults
From: Steve Shaw - PM
Date: 29 Jan 16 - 07:20 AM

Well no-one here is attempting to demonise people of faith. As for attacking religion, well that is always justified and there isn't anywhere near enough of it. But I for one do not want to have the arrival into the world of thousands of deformed babies for a stick to beat religion with. Let's all hope it doesn't happen.
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Crisis in Flint Michigan
From: olddude - PM
Date: 28 Jan 16 - 10:14 PM

Flint has a lot of sick kids, also they have a Republican governor. I guess with a 40 percent poverty rate in Flint, they don't count and most are black. [edit: really, another original comment about how all Republicans are racist. Tell me , have you heard the one where the chicken crosses the road?]
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Crisis in Flint Michigan
From: Richard Bridge - PM
Date: 29 Jan 16 - 03:18 AM

The difficulty with the question why we are not discussing this is that it seems there is nobody prepared to defend the governor's position. Perhaps, however the topic could be widened to include the Repuglitard threats to US environmental protection.
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Crisis in Flint Michigan
From: GUEST,# - PM
Date: 29 Jan 16 - 07:36 AM

They are not 'Repuglitards', they are Republicans. Please use the correct term for these duplicitous bastards or they won't know to whom you refer. Just like Conservatives in the UK and Conservatives in Canada.

They worship at the 'altar of mammon' and they are quite proud of that. They eat the young of the poor wherever they are, and this is just one more example. They divide humans by race and set us against each other. They steal food from others and then momentarily glut their never-ending appetites on the remains of the dead.
[...]
==============================================================================================================================================
Subject: BS: Dead twat in Oregon
From: Richard Bridge - PM
Date: 27 Jan 16 - 08:57 PM

I can't find anything about the Malheur nonsense although I thought there had been a thread.

Google is telling me something about archiving, so maybe a mod hid whatever there was.

Anyway, one ammosexual is dead (hooray) and the retards are trying to say he was a hero AND surrendering (er - contradiction in terms) which looks remarkably like their thought (if that is the right word) process goes

"Yup Billy-Bob iffen one of them N-words that Ah ain't allowed to say because of that darned perlitical correctness, despite the first amendment, can pretend he was surrendering like, so didn't need to get shot, even if the only one of them that is good is a dead one, then Ah reckin we can say the same an' set our dead white dear departed brother as a martyr, murdered by the chief N-word and his troops, which is why we gotta keep all our guns 'cos with our lil rifles if they send in the army well we kin shoot all of them and set up our own constitoooshinal republic yessir".

Why do you intelligent Merkins let the brain-dead rule the roost?

[edit: if the person he was mocking was black, though...]
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Dead twat in Oregon
From: Richard Bridge - PM
Date: 27 Jan 16 - 11:50 PM

Well, yes, given that the only non-twunt deaths at Waco were the initial unwary, which could readily now be avoided in Malheur, I'd think a full-bore government military assault a pretty good idea. In Waco the only dead in the later assault were all the whackos, I think it was 84 of them. Genetic improvement for the country. Death by stupidity. [edit: no, no kids were killed, not at all! I'm sure they had the option of being there.]
==================================================================================================================================================
Subject: RE: BS: Death in Oregon Confrontation With FBI
From: GUEST,# - PM
Date: 28 Jan 16 - 07:37 AM

"Why do you intelligent Merkins let the brain-dead rule the roost?"

Probably for the same reason educated people like you toss around the word 'retard' and allow your society to be destroyed by Conservatives under Cameron: lack of knowledge and a surfeit of stupidity in a large percentage in the general population. Howzat?
==================================================================================================================================================

Needless to say, I think I've made my case clear: there is a strong conservaphobia/religiophobia on this website that permeates it deeply. The few who stand by their beliefs (MGM Lion, akenaton, Pete from Seven Stars, and even occasionally Joe Offer) are strongly and harshly berated and assaulted by these people who claim to be for social progress. But in the midst of criticizing its opponents, they manage to use derogatory terms like "retard." They are a laughable bunch, and I'm embarrassed and upset to be on the same side of most of these issues as them. There is a much better way to get your point across than sweeping generalizations, suppositions, and pointless name-calling.

That is all.