Ake, it's easy to say that Mrs. Clinton is "shamelessly in the pockets of the corporations," but is that really true? What good would it do her to be a pawn of the corporations? She's an intelligent woman with interesting ideals, and she has the power to at least hope to achieve many of those ideals. Why would she subordinate herself to the corporations? What good, what satisfaction, would she get out of it?

It's clear that she has enough and doesn't need money. Why would she sell out to the corporations?

She's a moderate and a pragmatist, not an absolutist/idealist of the right or the left. She knows the corporations give jobs that are vital to the welfare of the country, so of course she has to do business with the corporations.

-Joe-