Hillary Clinton, as a defence attorney, acted to defend her client. The law requires cases to be held with an attorney for the prosecution, and an attorney for the defence. The fact that the person currently running for the job of President of the USA did her job should be seen as a positive. If she had refused to do her job (whether believing her client to be innocent or guilty)then it would be a failure of the US legal system. I don't fully understand US politics, or law, but I believe the above to be accurate. Can anyone correct my assumptions? If not, I think there's no more to be said.
|