Raggytash - 30 Mar 17 - 11:50 AM

Try reading what your pal wrote one more time this time paying a bit more attention Raggy.

"The reason that you never saw these common signs was probably because you were too busy looking for Traveller sites to firebomb" - Jim Carroll

The "probably" relates to not seeing signs Raggy, to read it your way the sentence would have read:

"The reason that you never saw these common signs was because you were probably too busy looking for Traveller sites to firebomb."

Some points for clarification Raggy:

1: I have never in my life ever seen any of these signs that your pal Jom says are common throughout mainland UK - Now how is that if they are so common? The example of such a sign that Carroll provides a link to, that Conn Mac Gabhann took such exception to, doesn't state any such thing as "Travellers Not Welcome" as Carroll insists - It doesn't bar or ban "Travellers" at all - which is probably why the CPS took no action in that particular case.

2: I can swear and affirm with total honesty that I have never firebombed, or considered firebombing anything or anybody in my life, and people had best be advised that to state in written form that I have had better have solid proof or face the consequences ( See Smith v Williams 2006)