Mudcat Café Message

sj

User Name	Thread Name	Subject	Posted
Keith A of Hertford	BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II (3626* d)	RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II	07 Apr 17
Steve Well if you agree that what he said can't have been antisemitic, do you agree that he should not have been "charged with antisemitism? If that had been all he said, yes. It was not. He tried to use that to defend Shah's undisputed (except by you people) anti-Semitism. His defence of anti-Semitism brought the party into disrepute. The party found him guilty. Naz Shah, much to her discredit, grovelled in order to save her own skin. Tell me exactly what she said that you regard as anti-Semitic We all know what she said. The party found it anti-Semitic. That is good enough for me. You did not. That signifies nothing!

Back to the Main Forum Page

By clicking on the User Name, you will requery the forum for that user. You will see everything that he or she has posted with that Mudcat name.

By clicking on the Thread Name, you will be sent to the Forum on that thread as if you selected it from the main Mudcat Forum page.
* Click on the linked number with * to view the thread split into pages (click "d" for chronologically descending).

By clicking on the Subject, you will also go to the thread as if you selected it from the original Forum page, but also go directly to that particular message.

By clicking on the Date (Posted), you will dig out every message posted that day.

Try it all, you will see.