Jim, That's what I said Keith - he did it on behalf of Britain because there is no longer an accepted definition of the term Now there is. which is not antisemitism, by any accepted definition All our mainstream parties are in agreement that his comments were anti-Semitic, as are yours. The Israeli Justice minister bacame an antisemite when she declared all criticism to be anti-Semitic No-one has declared any such nonsense. You have never specified or quantified wat the "serious" antisemitism is in the Labour Party and until somebody does, it doesn't exist other than as an accusation. It is not believable that they are all lying about it. It is believable that you are wrong about it. Your antisemitic claim that the Parliamentary Jewish members kept silent for the sake of the party still stands. It never stood because I never claimed it. If you did not mean this - why have they not made public all this "serious antisemitism" you are claiming They have. They made their complaints about the party to the leadership, as did those complaining of homophobia and misogyny. If you don't tall people what a "criminal" has done, he has done nothing illegal. I disagree. Lots of criminals are never identified. "You defend Ward." No I don't - I don't know anythiung about Ward You deny his anti-Semitism.
|