Big Al Whittle - 03 Jul 17 - 03:41 PM

"well its not impossible Teribus."

Dangerous world that Big Al - where baseless accusations and scurrilous allegations can be levelled that for some reason must not be challenged purely on the basis of them "not being impossible".

The following is a nonsense:

Party A states that Party B was guilty of committing murder based upon the hearsay "eye-witness evidence" of Party C. Yet "eye-witness" Party C cannot provide a single detail relating to the alleged murder - he/she cannot name the victim, cannot state the time, date, or location of where the murder took place - there is not even a body and no corroborating statements from others known to be present - then when pushed on these points Party C changes his/her story to him/her only hearing about such murders, i.e. Party C isn't an "eye-witness" at all. You tell me Big Al if you were Party B would you be happy to be sent down purely on the premise that "it's not impossible" - I know I bloody well wouldn't be.