On that Homs Thread Carroll that was your trouble -

Subject: RE: BS: Homs horror
From: GUEST,Teribus - PM
Date: 20 Feb 12 - 11:26 AM

"You have objected when it is pointed out that some of the sniper bullets now cutting down civilian men women and children on the streets of Homs (or went into the training of the snipers) came from Britain." – (Jim Carroll)

"There is not one shred of evidence to back up that contention of yours "Christmas" - still sticking to that "small arms arms" thing I see.

To pursue this fable of yours, into a thread about what is going on in Homs, Syria you have introduced by way of diversion and deflection - Libya, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Zimbabwe, Tanzania and Bahrain - Where are you headed next Jim-Lad?? It won't matter because one thing is certain - Britain sold no weapons to Syria.

Your usual spittle-flecked rants get so incoherent that you completely lose track of what the discussion is about. If you wish me to - just to demonstrate that it was not solely myself who found your posts complete and utter nonsense - I can easily dig up what pdq commented on your posts, or what about GUEST 999 and others on that Homs Terror Thread?

Example

Subject: RE: BS: Homs horror
From: pdq - PM
Date: 23 Feb 12 - 03:31 PM

The Russian 7.62 round is older in design that the 7.62 NATO that a private arms seller in England was authorized to sell to Syria.

No proof that the ammunition was actually delivered and the permission to sell was revoked in a reasonable time.

Since the rifles used in Syria are Russian design and use ammunition that is not compatible with the 7.62 NATO rounds authorized, it is really a stretch to blame the Brits for the atrocities committed by Assad.

Loads more Carroll.