Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj



User Name Thread Name Subject Posted
GUEST,matt milton £8299 vs £299 acoustic guitars (10) RE: £8299 vs £299 acoustic guitars 20 Jul 19


"How can anyone make a guitar for £200 or £299 that plays at all?"

Computers and lasers basically. The huge difference between guitar making today compared to even 20 years ago is that you have a computer-assisted design and laser-accurate cutting. So it's just much cheaper and more accurate and quicker.

I own several acoustic guitars and the most I have ever spent on one is £360. All of my guitars were made in Chinese factories. The cheapest of them is my Harley Benton mahogany parlour, about £150 new. Solid mahogany top, laminate back and sides. It's great, comfortable to play and does what I want it to do just as well as any Collings or Martin or Taylor I've played..

My favourite among my guitars is my Recording King ROS616, an all-solid mahogany orchestra size model. I have never played a guitar that I prefer to my ROS616, and that includes Lowdens, Fyldes etc. I don't see the point of £2000+ luthier made guitars frankly.

Ironically, the only reason I could imagine spending over £1000 on a guitar would be to commission a luthier to make me a replacement for my factory-made £360 ROS616 if it were to ever get smashed or stolen, as unfortunately the model is discontinued.


Post to this Thread -

Back to the Main Forum Page

By clicking on the User Name, you will requery the forum for that user. You will see everything that he or she has posted with that Mudcat name.

By clicking on the Thread Name, you will be sent to the Forum on that thread as if you selected it from the main Mudcat Forum page.

By clicking on the Subject, you will also go to the thread as if you selected it from the original Forum page, but also go directly to that particular message.

By clicking on the Date (Posted), you will dig out every message posted that day.

Try it all, you will see.