George posted "Another one of those wrote disagreeing with . .

"However I'd say Clinton is 120% right in his statement (and it's not often I find myself strongly in agreement with him). Indeed. I'd say he was stating the obvious. What's your problem with the idea?

And no, it's not something I can "agree to differ" over; I think it's a silly choice which is inevitably damaging for the kids . . "

I am realy sorry, but we're going to have to "agree to disagree" or I guess you'll have to be mad at me, because I simply can't agree that Mr. Hammonds assessment is always and 100% accurate in all cases.

However, I would like to redirect this back to the intent of my post; It was just an analogy used to express the emotions involved when dealing with a bad band dynamic. It was never my intent to start a thread on marriage/commitment/children in this forum, and had I done so, I would have marked it BS.

I hope my addressing Mr. Hammond so formally has not given people the impression that I am angry. Not at all. I would like to treat all here with the utmost respect, as I believe that this is a wonderfully intelligent, knowledgeable, and supportive community worthy of every courtesy. Truly! :D

Friends?