Well, now you know how I felt when Clinton was nominated a couple of years ago...

And actually, (though I do like what Bush has done) I do believe that Tony was the man of the match, and probably deserves it more than any person who comes to mind at this moment. He had the most to lose, clearly spoke from conviction, tried to work with two opposed sides, gave moral force to the arguement, and is now trying to reconcile the US and the EU.

There are others, George Mitchel for his work in Ireland, for example. But the list is short...