I was hoping you'd enlighten us, Richard!

I assumed it meant that some trivial dotting of i's or crossing of t's wasn't done in the corrrect and prescribed manner, so for some minor technicality the prosecution case wasn't valid. Does "abuse of process" mean something more contentious than that?

As for other cases, mentioned a few posts back, we haven't heard any more about Pat Cooksey's, have we?

Anahata