The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #63369 Message #1031624
Posted By: Nigel Parsons
08-Oct-03 - 03:24 AM
Thread Name: BS: No 'right to choose' this...
Subject: RE: BS: No 'right to choose' this...
Kevin: "Laws may not be made for single cases (though they can be), but single cases very often show when it is necessary for a law to be changed. And once again I agree with what Mary Warnock wrote: "If the law says the man has the right to prevent even the attempt at having a baby, it's a bad law and should be changed." As i pointed out before, ova can be frozen unfertilised. The law does not prevent the attempt at having a baby, it prevents the forced participation of a second party! Mary Warnock's comment is a one sided view of the issue. (no pun on 'issue' intended)