MofH,


I think if you were to take the boring ride down my posting history here at mudcat (via the archives) I think you'd find that...

-most of my posts are critical of Rush, though...

-some of them acknowledge that the information he reiterates is not always wrong just because it is he who states it.

In almost every case where I am thought to be "defending Rush", it is merely some other poster making that (wrong) assumption.

I may, on occasion, have "defended" what I knew to be a false assumption I saw in another's assertions about Rush.