thanks, Dan...but, as you see, when asking people to use the acedemic definition so that we may refer to the same thing, the answer is so often, "I don't wanna! I wanna call it what I wanta call it"...and there is no arguing with that.What I do for a semi-living is woodturning...I work with exotic woods from all over the world at times, and I constantly struggle with those folk who want to use some 'common' name to sell me a piece of wood, and get huffy when I tell them that is NOT 'Rosewood', for example..."Oh, it's Bolivian Rosewood", they say...Sorry- there IS no Rosewood in Bolivia, that is 'Striped Caviuna'...dealers would call EVERYTHING by half a dozen 'interesting' names if they could...'Rosewood' sells, 'Caviuna' does not..I hear 'South American' Walnut, and 'Queensland Walnut'...and it ain't Walnut. Few people are willing to even ADMIT that the scientific name is relevant, much less USE it...too much trouble!..
and I'm sure that many people have similar stories in THEIR profession..