no...wait here's the Man track in Texas....it says it and other similar ones had been disproved and accepted as mostly weathering features that resembled 'tracks'...(reminds me of images of the
-----

The tracks of the man were great. There were multiple footsteps (both left and right footprints, and the footprints were so precise; you could see the impression of the fibers used to sew the peices of leather together. under magnification)

Why is it that you will take the word of scientists (that will not tell the truth about these forbidden archeological items? It would shake up their paradigm), and you are unwilling to do your own research. Maybe you are not willing to search for the truth at all.

I am through with this debate with you; no matter what else you post.

Two Bears