TTR: and your attack on Teribus is NOT personal? Strange how some folks, who cannot offer good arguments to support their position, resort to that strategy.

Teribus view, as stated in his past three or four posts, is an excellent summation of the hearings in my opinion, and the conclusions he draws are absolutely correct.

Interesting how so many people responding to this thread jump to the defence of Richard Clarke when it was HE that proposed preimptive strikes against the Taliban without the express approval of the Congress or anyone else. I thought most of you folks were peaceloving.

PDC: you're a riot.

DougR