The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #68215   Message #1149741
Posted By: Jim McCallan
30-Mar-04 - 04:48 AM
Thread Name: BS: Condi Rice on National Security?
Subject: RE: BS: Condi Rice on National Security?
"But it is conceivable, I believe, that if one was found to have lied...", one must have first gone through the process of being questioned on the matter, based on the same criteria whereby everyone else was questioned. Otherwise you just leave yourself wide open to criticism.

If you can impeach a President over the definition of 'sexual relations', one should (theoretically) be able to create a precedent where the National Security Advisor would get her sweet little ass dragged up to account for itself.
Considering that the precedent which created this present precedent, was none other than 9/11 itself.

Let's have enough of 20/20 hindsight, already. What's wrong with a bit of good old plain ordinary 20/20?

Were Al Gore in the White House now, and all this mess was around his ears, you would be the loudest voice shouting into it, DougR.

Jim