Ah, but early on in the war, a STOCKPILE of empty shells for chemical weapons ( WMDs) was found, and all the anti-war folks said that that did not count, since there were no chemicals in them. Now we have the chemicals, and the line is that anyone could have made them.

Seems like a flaw in the logic, somehwere.

If the hardware is not the weapon, and the chemicals are not the weapon, what is?

But this thread is drifting. NOTE that the first CONVICTION of a US soldier has happened- WHERE are the fatwahs by the Islamic clergy denouncing the acts of their people????