This is unbearable; as much because of the uncertainty. Surely even at night, the difference between armed insurgency and a houseparty is obvious? How could two such contradictory stories be told about the same event???

The Chinooks often carry video-cameras in their noses -- don't they show evidence that one or the other is true? Where's the intell that indicates this was a hot enemy site rather than the domestic village portrayed by the Guardian? These two stories are totally incompatible. Somebody's lying through their teeth, and I would like to know what the hell is going on.

A