TTR,

I hate to do this, but I have to go with LH and Amos. As a scientist, I will admit there are some things that I do not have theories that explain the facts. To rule out what Two Bears claims, without examination of the facts of the cases, is more charlatanism than his claims to have done so. I tend to give more value to firsthand testimony than I would to the attitude that, since I don't uunderstand something, it must not be so.