Here we have one character spewing guff and not-even-half-truths about his "reasons' for attacking a nation which was no kind of threat to America, and a challenger who sees merit in playing up his part in a campaign against another nation which had no designs whatsoever against the U.S.of A. Talk about "Hobson's Choice"? I'm truly sorry for the American people--=-those who can actually see that both options are seriously flawed, anyway. The only [ and very important ] difference between the options is the fact that national vote for Kerry would see the demise of the most dangerous presidential retinue ever to have fouled the reputation of America.
I can't imagine a different president being able to find a bunch quite as base. Who to blame if Bush really wins it this time? Who else can be blamed than the many American citizens who will have voted for him in spite of knowing the character of the man and his crew?