Nerd, I'm not grasping your logic, but I'm guessing that may be because your thinking involves some loyalty to either the Democratic or Republican party?

So if you would please, help me see if I'm understanding you correctly.

Your argument is, it seems to me, that since someone is going to win the election no matter what, a voter with one particular threshold issue (just as a for instance) should vote for the person whom the voter knows is lying about the things on your (the voter's) election agenda, even if they won't deliver, because that candidate is preferable to voting for someone who may or may not be lying, but either has no equivalent plan or a plan you disagree with.

Have I got that right? Is that what you are saying?