To Lizzie, (and others who make similar points elsewhere),

What is it on Steve's SeeRed site that you disagree with? Is it that you think there is information on there that is inaccurate or incorrect? If so, what information is that?

I've seen him ask the same questions in these threads but haven't seen an answer yet. I am not Steve or any alias of his, I am just another festival goer who happens to like to take a rationally questioning approach to life and as such I quite like seeing the arguments set out in black and white. As far as I can see, that is all Steve is trying to do. If it comes across as overly critical at times then that is his perogative (free country & all that) - but to be honest I haven't seen much sign of it - yes he questions the motivations of some people but surely asking questions is a reasonable thing to do? It only becomes a problem when the people who are being asked the questions either refuse to reply or reply with big defensive 'how dare you criticise me/us/the festival/what we're trying to do?' without answering the actual questions in the first place.

So, my question to you is - what is there on Steve's seered site that you think is unfair? Can you provide any direct quotes?