thing is Steve Harris, surely one way to deal with people doing what you say Steve at seered is doing is to simply and honestly answer the question in a factual way. Even if you think that he's asking the question to prove some point about not knowing arses from elbows. I haven't ever noticed him asking a question that was completely impossible to answer. And his main complaint that I've seen seems to be 'nobody will answer my questions' so if his questions got answered then he wouldn't have anything to complain about would he?

All that I've seen happen is, Steve at seered asks a question and is met with a very defensive 'how dare you imply I don't know my arse from my elbow?' response which doesn't really move anything forward. And it looks from the outside that the people being asked questions are completely unwilling to enter into a dialogue about anything.

I asked a question (of Lizzie, but I can ask it of you too...) of 'could you give me a quote of anything from the seered site that you feel is inaccurate or misinformation?' I haven't had an answer yet. Lizzie made it pretty clear that she hadn't read most of Steve's site anyway and that the things she didn't like was that it was a waste of time, left her stone cold, and quoted her... (nevermind that it also quoted Steve Heap which was a "GOOD THING !!!!!!!   :-) ;-) ")