"A model which insists on knowledge being generated and located in the body/brain complex only cannot account for a single instance of non-local knowing."

non-local knowing seems to be a fairly arcane concept of quantum mechanics, and I see no reason that a model that simply doubts (not 'dis-believes'...just formal doubt) that the brain goes beyond bio-chemical complexity NEEDS to account for a concept that is only a theory itself!

If I read you correctly, I think I see the same assumptions present here.....that you 'know' that stuff like 'non-local knowing' exists, and that we must therefore account for it...

as to "clinical studies and case histories"...*grin*..."The devil may cite scripture for his purpose."