i>There seems little point in insisting on one side taking offence - when it is perfectly clear that no offence is intended.

Equally there is litle point in insisting that one side should not take offence - when is is clear that offence is being taken.

But I have yet to see much firm evidence of actual offence being taken by these traditions in the UK, especially when and when explanation is given.

Perhaps those who are said to be possibly offended are too busy in the UK, trying get a decent place to live, trying a decent job or promotion on their merits or to get their children a decent education or prevent them from being picked on by the police?