Sorry DougR, many of them just don't get it.

But the article was, on the whole, well balanced and contained some criticism as well as successes. I especially enjoyed the sidebar article with George 41 and Barbara, and the other comparing the Kennedy clan with the Bush successes (Kennedys in effective power less than 1,000 days with little to show for it, the Bushes with well over 4,000 and counting). Just the critque of the how the Bush clan learns from family mistakes and adapts, is stuff to crush the heart of any liberal and/or Democrat.

And Bobert while I don't necessarily disagree with your premise that we can be "hit", I wonder why it hasen't happened once since 9/11?

They don't want to?

They want our elections to show a clear majority for Bush?

They were only waiting for Kerry to be elected?

Under your senario money is apparently not the problem, nor has it been in Iraq with the IEDs.

Is it lack of political will? Lack of faith of American Muslims? Are non-American Muslims streaming to our shores to start the Jihad? And it took them three and a half years to get here?

Why is it? Could George have been right!!!!

Has anyone noticed that while some of our troops are still the targets of the IEDs, far more are directed at potential polling places, Iraqi Police stations and Iraqi politicians.

Could George have been right?

And if John McCain and Condi Rice run against Hillary and some Democrat with a dick, in 2008 what will you do????