And lets not forget before the revisionists come thru and try to rewrite the nightmare-ish policies of this most immoral adminstration that what it boiled down to was Bush telling Saddam that Saddam, if he didn't want to get whacked, had to prove that he didn't have WMDs???

LIke, how does one go about proving they don't have something???

When I brought this question up back before the invasion, Teribus, et al, wrote "War 'n Peace" length rebuttals that never quite got around to answering this very basic question...

Hmmmmmm?

Now here's what to this very day I don't understand and maybe a bb, or one of the other blind followers of Bush, might have an answer:

Like, ahhhh, if millions of folks seemed to have the "intellegence" that the Big Three (mishroom clouds, WMD's and Al Qeada connection) were bogus, then why is Bush now hiding behind the "Gee, I acted on the intellegence I had"?????

Yeah, Bushites. Answer us that one, if you can...

Bobert